Tag Archive | Truth

Dropping the Bomb

Hey, guys. Many of you might have found out about James (the Amazing One) Randi’s recent ‘coming out,’ and it gave me the idea to open up to my incredible readership in revealing a little something that hasn’t been mentioned in great detail in the past, though I’ve occasionally alluded to it from time to time.

Some of you may have suspected it from my writing style, some from my early comment responses, others of you already knew, to more than just a few this may be a bit of a surprise, and some probably just won’t give a crap…

No, I’m not gay — not if any of my ex-girlfriends have a say in the matter — but I do harbor a rather bothersome medical condition that I’m not particularly proud of, nor especially happy about, but which I’ve seen no reason to hide in person, and as of now, here…

I’m schizophrenic.

This condition is one of the most debilitating neurological disorders known to Man (or Woman for you readers of the fairer sex), and something that I have struggled with ever since my early twenties.

My particular condition is one of a family of related disorders, having nothing to do with ‘split-personalities’ as they are popularly termed (That is actually referred to, if I recall correctly, as Disassociative Identity Disorder, an entirely different class of condition) in the media, and this is one of the many reasons among others that I’m a skeptic, since keeping better in tune with reality is a Good Thing™, as this enables me to stay out of trouble more easily than would otherwise be the case.

Is skepticism effective for combating mental illness? I would venture not by itself, and I recommend to others with mental illnesses that you stay on your treatment plan and follow it scrupulously, just to be on the safe side.

You are not alone.

For me though, skepticism is a useful adjunct to my basic treatment. Learning to think clearly is always a good thing with or without a problematic condition.

Few with the more extreme variants of my condition can benefit from skepticism, and many often require physical care as well. But fortunately my illness is mild enough and sufficiently amenable to treatment to allow me to function in daily life and do the things I enjoy, like post on and administer this blog.

I consider myself lucky, to the extent luck actually exists, that I got treatment for my affliction during the early stages before it became too advanced, otherwise I would not be typing this into my browser window for you all to read.

Pushing the ‘publish’ button for this entry was not an easy decision, but a necessary one. Some things are important enough that they need to be said. The Randi-Meister was a big factor in this…

As one of those ‘fervently dogmatic, pseudo-skeptical, pseudo-intellectual (and according to one recent commenter, ‘unread’) debunkers,’ there is no point in pretending to be what I am not and can never be — perfectly normal, ‘just like everyone else’ — since the truth should always be paramount.

Hence this post.

I have little doubt that this entry will be used as a convenient source of ammunition by those online who’ve expressed impatience towards my ‘attitude’ as a skeptic, and that’s fine with me — as long as any disagreement between me and others remains bloodless and gentlemanly — including disagreements with those I’ve annoyed in the past. And believe me, I’ve annoyed quite a few…

For the past couple of decades, I’ve worked at a vocational rehabilitation business as an administrative assistant, only retired as of last December, and this has helped immensely in my personal growth and experience in the workplace.

The people I met and knew there, clients and employees, will always be a reminder how much stigma is still attached to mental illness in this country, as well as others. They will also be a reminder of the incredible resilience of human courage, hope, and ability.

I plan to diversify the subject matter posted on this site to include advocacy for the rights and well-being of those with disabling psychiatric conditions, both like and unlike my own.

I’ve so far immensely surpassed where I was when my illness first popped up some years ago, and I plan to do better still, helping others like me as well. You, my readers both locally and around the world are an absolute joy to write for, and this blog is a wonderful journey & learning experience for my Troythuluness.

Let’s travel and learn together.

Like it says in my collector’s edition copy of the Principia Discordia— Fnord.


I am not an Atheist

I’ve been posting on this blog for a little over a year now, since December 28, 2008, and I’ve frequently referred to myself in many of my posts by the word ‘atheist.’ I suspect that this is not entirely accurate, not as I would define myself, only as theists would.

As a former religionist, having left the Seventh-Day Adventist church many years ago, I’ve given bits and pieces of the many reasons for my current status as a non-believer in most any form of theism on this blog, but they all boil down to one basic theme: Simply put, I have not heard any compelling arguments nor been shown any convincing evidence for the existence of any God of the sort commonly worshiped in the world’s major monotheistic religions. But that’s a tall order, for each religion has a concept of the divine that conflicts with nearly every other religion’s notion of the godhead.

I’ve heard a lot of different arguments which those using them claim to be proof of God, but none of them has been really convincing. All have logical holes in them that are readily apparent even to my layman’s mind. I have the same skepticism toward all those other gods I had as an Adventist, but I’ve just gone one God further.

I consider myself firstly to be an agnostic, in that as a philosophical position I hold that the existence of any God of the sorts commonly worshiped is literally an unknowable, not just something I haven’t made up my mind on. Lately I’ve been questioning my use of the label ‘atheist’ to refer to my lack of belief in a supreme being of the conventional sort.

While I don’t believe in any of the different versions of the God of the Abrahamic traditions, (Christianity alone has splintered into over 30,000 different variations of itself, many of which don’t recognize the others as legitimate Christians…) nor in any sort of anthropomorphic divine being, there is one concept of God that I can take seriously — the God of Baruch Spinoza, of Einstein — a pantheistic divinity that is the sum total of the Laws of the Universe.

After all, why not? You’d be pretty silly to not believe in the existence of physical laws, even if you don’t practice any sort of formal worship, mysticism or any other trappings of organized religion. A sense of awe of the Cosmos and reverence for life is all that’s needed. A form of free-form worship unsullied by dogma or superstition in which (thanks to Terry Pratchett for this one…) the building of a telescope is the building of a cathedral.

Whether I am really an atheist depends entirely on how one defines God, and this varies hugely from one faith to the next. Hell, Christians can’t even agree among themselves which is the ‘correct’ conception of God.

I have difficulty taking seriously the archaic idea of a fellow sitting on a throne in the sky who spends a great deal of his time micromanaging every event in the Universe, and is the patron of only one species, one planet, in a cosmos less than 10,000 years old. Such a small, parochial view of the divine! Such a limited view that has absolutely nothing of the cosmic grandeur that science makes readily apparent! Why should I want my God to be a little one, and why keep him that way? Why should I arrogantly impose my wishes upon God?


We know very little about the Universe, and I’m convinced that we know even less about God — not the supernatural God of the Old Testament — but a naturalistic God so far beyond anything we know that we could not possibly begin to imagine what He, She, or It is like.

I have a firm trust and confidence in the existence of the laws of the Cosmos, supported by evidence, not the authority of a book written thousands of years ago, with the caveat that neither myself nor anyone else fully comprehends them all to the extent we would like. If that’s what one means by belief in a God, then call me a theist, or rather, a pantheist. I suppose that would describe me just as well, since I’m only an atheist according to some other people’s conception of God. And should I allow myself to be defined by some other person’s criteria? No.

I, like every other living, thinking being in existence, am made of atoms forged in the hearts of stars. I am star-stuff given life and thought. I am nothing more and nothing less than one out of countless ways for the Universe to contemplate itself. I am not an atheist, but one who stands in awe before both the beauty and horror of this unthinkably vast, complex and elegant thing we call reality.

Thank you, Dr. Sagan. You are missed…